2009 PLP 735 (MLD)
Haji ZAKIR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2009 PLP 735 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Haji ZAKIR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 735 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 735 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 735 (MLD) (Haji ZAKIR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.420, 467, 468 & 471/34
Accused was arrested on the implication of the principal accused
Accused, who was named in F.I.R., was also involved in the "Gothabad Scheme"
Recovery of purported forged register maintaining record, forged entry and prepared Sanad of the property under Gothabad Scheme, was effected
Counsel for accused had stated that incriminating register had been foisted, but such ground could not be examined at the bail stage
Trial Court, was directed to examine the complainant and the Investigating Officer preferably within a period of three months, whereafter accused would be at liberty to move bail application afresh.
Judgment & Decree
MUSHIR ALAM, J.
The applicant is facing trial in Crime No.104/2007 for an offence under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34, P.P.C. Police Station North Nazimabad Karachi. The applicant was arrested on the implication of the principal accused Moula Bux, he was also named in the F.I.R. that he was also involved in the Gothabad Scheme. Applicant was arrested, recovery of purported forged register maintaining record, forged entry and prepared sanad of the property under Gothabad scheme. Though learned counsel for the applicants states the incriminating register has been foisted such ground cannot be examined at the bail stage. Since the accused are arrested learned Trial Court is directed to examine the complainant and the I.O. preferably within a period of three months whereafter applicant will be at liberty to move bail afresh. Listed bail application disposed of. H.B.T./Z-32/K Bail refused.