1989SCMR679 (PLP)
NAJIB ULLAH — Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, FAISALABAD
| Citation | 1989SCMR679 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Saad Saood Jan and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ |
| Parties | NAJIB ULLAH — Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, FAISALABAD |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989SCMR679 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989SCMR679 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Saad Saood Jan and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989SCMR679 (PLP) (NAJIB ULLAH — Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, FAISALABAD). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 22nd November, 1988.
- Ch. Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal, dated 4-1-1986, passed in Case No. 625/546 of 1983).
Art.212(3)--Civil servant's dismissal from service upheld in departmental appeal and by the Service Tribunal--Full-fledged enquiry was conducted against civil servant and he was provided with ample opportunity to defend himself- Supreme Court declined to undertake re-appraisal of evidence--No question of law of general importance being involved in the case, leave to appeal was refused.
Judgment & Decree
ALI HUSSAIN QAZILBASH, J.‑‑This is a petition for leave to appeal against the order of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated 4‑1‑1986.
2. Najib Ullah petitioner was a Patwari and he was charge‑sheeted by the Collector, Faisalabad. He pleaded not guilty but the Enquiry Officer found him guilty and the Collector after hearing the petitioner dismissed him from service on 30‑6‑1983. His departmental appeal was dismissed on 30‑1.0‑1984 and the appeal before the Tribunal was dismissed on 4‑1‑1986.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. A full‑fledged enquiry was conducted against him and he was provided with ample opportunity to defend himself. The learned counsel for the petitioner wanted us to re‑appraise the evidence which at this stage we decline to undertake. Further, no question of law of general importance is involved in this case. The petition is dismissed. A.A./N‑120/S Leave to appeal refused.