1993 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN — Petitioner Versus A.S.P. — Respondent
| Citation | 1993 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN — Petitioner Versus A.S.P. — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN — Petitioner Versus A.S.P. — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ch. Nazir Muhammad for Petitioner.
- Haji Muhammad Ashraf Butt for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
Art.199
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.154
Penal Code (XLV of 1860); 5.365
Registration of F.I.R:
Allegation levelled by petitioner was not found to be correct by the Investigating Officer during investigation of the murder case, however, said investigation being still in progress petitioner could urge his view point before the Investigating Officer and if not satisfied with his conduct could move for change of investigation
Police could also register a case against the respondents if during investigation petitioner's version was found to be true
Constitutional petition with such observations was disposed of.
Judgment & Decree
Haji Muhammad Ashraf Butt for Respondent. Muhammad Akram Khan seeks the registration of case against Zia Ullah alias Sain, Muhammad Anwar, Zulfiqar alias Bhutto, Niamat alias Buddah, Rafaqat and Shabbir for abducting his relative Ibrar Ahmad alias Bari son of Zulfiqar on 24-10-1992. According to him, he had submitted application to the D.I.-G. Lahore Range and other Police Officers but with no result.
2. A report was called from S.H.O. Police Station Narang into the above allegations. According to him there is a land dispute between the parties and proceedings under section 145, Cr.P.C. have also been initiated against them. He adds that the allegation levelled by the petitioner was enquired into during the investigation of case F.I.R. No.269 dated 26-10-1992 under section 302,' P.P.C. pertaining to the murder of Muhammad Ashraf in which Ibrar Ahmad alias Bari mentioned above is stated to be the principal offender and it was found that no such occurrence had taken place. Haji Muhammad Ashraf, learned counsel for Rafaqat Ali respondent states that the petitioner has not come to the Court with clean hands and is seeking registration of the case against those who are witnesses in the case against Ibrar alias Bari in case F.I.R. No.269 under section 302, P.P.C. pertaining to the murder of Muhammad Ashraf. According to him, the purpose behind the registration of the case is to prevent the prosecution witnesses from deposing against his relative Ibrar alias Bari and his co-accused. The case F.I.R. No.269/92, dated 26-10-1992 is stated to be still under investigation. The petitioner can appear before the Investigating Officer and urge his view point before him and in case he is not satisfied with his conduct he can approach S.P., Sheikhupura for change of the investigation. If during the investigation his version is found to be true the police can register a case against the respondents. For the foregoing reasons, no interference is called for by this Court at this stage. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. N.H.Q./M-771/L Order accordingly,