1999 PLP 1258 (MLD)
SAGHIR AHMAD — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1999 PLP 1258 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SAGHIR AHMAD — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 1258 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 1258 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 1258 (MLD) (SAGHIR AHMAD — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
S.497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 435/336/427
Bail, grant of-- Accused admittedly being not known to the complainant previously, he must have been put to identification test by the prosecution which was not done-- Case of accused, thus, needed further probe
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Bail Application No. 1753 of 1996, decided on 7th November, 1996.
S.497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 435/336/427
Bail, grant of-- Accused admittedly being not known to the complainant previously, he must have been put to identification test by the prosecution which was not done-- Case of accused, thus, needed further probe
Accused was enlarged on bail accordingly. Syed Mahmood Alam Rizvi for Applicant. Muhammad Sarwar Khan, A.A.-G. alongwith Habib Ahmed for the State. Contention of the learned counsel for the applicant, inter alia, is that since admittedly the complainant had not known the accused previously, it was imperative that the accused should have been put to identification test. Since, no such test was held, the case of the applicant requires further enquiry. Since we find ourselves in agreement with the said contention, bail is granted to the applicant in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Fifty thousand) with one surety to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. N.H.Q/S-88/K Bail allowed.