1987 PLP 1601 (MLD)
JAMES MASIH — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1601 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Mamoon Kazi, J |
| Parties | JAMES MASIH — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1601 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1601 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Mamoon Kazi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1601 (MLD) (JAMES MASIH — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ---Ss.497, 498, 499 & 501--Surety bond--Increase of amount Accused who was released on bail on furnishing one surety bond remaining absent on date of hearing in Court of Additional Sessions Judge and asked by the Court to furnish two sureties--Prayer of accused to reduce amount of surety to original bond furnished by him not opposed by State Counsel--Order accordingly.
Headnotes / Summary
Sardar Muhammad Ishaq for Applicant. Sarfraz Ahmad, A.A.-G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 768 of 1987, decided on 2nd July, 1987.
Ss.497, 498, 499 & 501--Surety bond--Increase of amount Accused who was released on bail on furnishing one surety bond remaining absent on date of hearing in Court of Additional Sessions Judge and asked by the Court to furnish two sureties--Prayer of accused to reduce amount of surety to original bond furnished by him not opposed by State Counsel--Order accordingly. Sardar Muhammad Ishaq for Applicant. Sarfraz Ahmad, A.A.-G. for the State. The applicant was on bail before the learned IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi when he remained absent on a date of hearing with the result that he has now been asked to furnish two sureties in the sum of Rs.20,000 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Earlier, according to Sardar Muhammad Ishaq, the applicant had been released on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety. I have heard Mr. Sarfraz Ahmad, learned A.A.-G. He has no objection if the amount of the bond is reduced to the original one which was earlier furnished by the applicant before the learned Additional Sessions Judge and the number of sureties is also reduce to one. Copy of this order shall be sent to the third learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi South for compliance. M.Y.H./J-21/ K Petition accepted.