1989 PLP 1000 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL and 3 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1000 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Kadir Shaikh, S. A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ISMAIL and 3 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1000 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1000 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Shaikh, S. A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1000 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD ISMAIL and 3 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Azizullah K. Shaikh, Advocate, Supreme Court and A. A. Dastagir, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing: 1st March, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order and judgment of the Special Appellate Court (Customs), Karachi in Spl. Cr. Bail A. No.17 of 1988). Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑Ss. 497 & 498‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑Pre‑arrest bail‑‑ Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and same was allowed with the result that accused were granted pre‑arrest bail on their furnishing one surety each in the specified amount and executing personal bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court. Imam Ali Kazi, Dy. A.‑G., Sind for the State.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J ‑‑For the reasons shown separately this petition is converted into an appeal and it is allowed with the result that petitioners are granted pre‑arrest bail on their furnishing one surety each in the sum of Rs.2,00,000 (two lacs only) and executing personal bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Petitioners are granted ten days time to furnish sureties and in the meantime shall remain on bail on the basis of surety bonds and personal bonds already furnished in the trial Court. This order will however not prevent the prosecution from applying for the cancellation of petitioners' bail if sufficient evidence is produced against petitioners. On such an application being made it will be open to the trial Court to pass such order as may be deemed fit and necessary in accordance with law. A.A./M‑781/S Pre‑arrest bail granted.