1993 P Cr (PLP)
ABDUL WAHEED BAJWA — Applicant Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 1993 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ABDUL WAHEED BAJWA — Applicant Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 P Cr (PLP) (ABDUL WAHEED BAJWA — Applicant Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 14
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.561-A
Contentions that the applicant had already been granted bail in the cases registered against him, that before initiating proceedings the mandatory provisions of S.5 of the Act were not complied with, that S.14 of the Act was not attracted to the circumstances of the case and that mere submission of list of pending cases by itself was not sufficient for initiating proceedings under the Act, had been conceded by the State counsel-- Proceedings pending against the applicant in the Court of Magistrate were quashed accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Muhammad Ayyub v. The State 1984 P Cr. L J 2889; Sachu alias Sacho-e-Dino v. The State 1984 P Cr. L J 647 and Amir Ali and 22 others v. The State 1986 P Cr. L J 30 ref. Muhammad Faridul Haq for Applicant. Ali Nawaz Daheraj for the State. Date of hearing: 16th September, 1992. Applicant Abdul Waheed Bajwa, under section 561-A, Cr.P.C., has applied for quashment of proceeding initiated against him, under section 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act, 1975, hereinafter called the Act, as per order, dated 10th July, 1992, passed by A.C. and S.D.M., Airport Karachi, East. The facts relevant for decision of this application are as follows:-- The case of prosecution is that the applicant is habitual, desperate, and a dangerous criminal. He is involved in seven cases bearing F.I.R. Nos.137/87, 144/87, 5/88, 477/88, 136/89, 310/89 and 39/92, registered at various police stations and is facing trial for the offences including the offences punishable under sections 124-A, 307 and 382, P.P.C. The applicant has claimed that he is a social and political worker and since oftenly he criticised the local administration and the bureaucrats, he has falsely been involved in the offences of the F.I.R, mentioned earlier. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that he has already been granted bail in the cases registered on the basis of F.I.R. mentioned above and that before initiating proceedings the mandatory provisions contained in section 5 of the Act were not complied with. Also, it has been argued that section 14 of the Act is not attracted to the circumstances of this case. Further, it is submitted that mere submission of list of pending cases by itself is not sufficient for initiating proceedings under the Act. In support of these contentions, learned counsel for the applicant cited (1) Muhammad Ayyub v. The State 1984 P Cr. L J 2889, (2) Sachu alias Sacho-e-Dino v. The State 1984 P Cr. L J 647, (3) Amir Ali and 22 others v. The State 1986 P Cr. L J
30. Learned State counsel frankly conceded the contentions raised on behalf of the applicant and submitted that, in view of non-compliance of the provisions of the Act and utter disregard of the case-law laid down by this Court in various reported cases, the proceedings deserve to be quashed. Accordingly, this application is allowed and the proceedings in question are quashed. N.H.Q./A-1339/K Proceedings quashed.