2010 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
WAQAR AHMAD Versus DIRECTOR PUBLIC INFORMATION (COLLEGES), PUNJAB GOVERNMENT, LAHORE and 5 others
| Citation | 2010 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Hafiz Abdul Rehman Ansari, J |
| Parties | WAQAR AHMAD Versus DIRECTOR PUBLIC INFORMATION (COLLEGES), PUNJAB GOVERNMENT, LAHORE and 5 others |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Hafiz Abdul Rehman Ansari, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (WAQAR AHMAD Versus DIRECTOR PUBLIC INFORMATION (COLLEGES), PUNJAB GOVERNMENT, LAHORE and 5 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Hamid Hassan Peerzada for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Arts. 199 & 212(3)
Appeal against order of Service Tribunal
Scope
High Court had no jurisdiction to interfere in the judgment passed by Service Tribunal. Export Promotion Bureau and others v. Qaiser Shafiullah 1994 SCMR 859 ref.
Judgment & Decree
HAFIZ ABDUL REHMAN ANSARI, J.
Through this constitutional petition, petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court for declaring the impugned judgment and decree dated 12-11-2009 passed by learned Member-III, Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is dispute of promotion between the petitioner and private respondents Nos.4 to 6; petitioner was confronted with the proposition that against the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal appeal before the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan under Article 212(3) of the Constitution is filed; learned counsel makes reliance on case titled as Export Promotion Bureau and others v. Qaiser Shafiullah 1994 SCMR
859. If order is without jurisdiction he contends that this Court can interfere in the judgment passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal.
3. The contention of the learned counsel is misconceived. Case cited by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not related to the law point involved in this petition does not advance the case of the petitioner. Whatever the grievance of the petitioner is from the judgment passed by Member-III, Punjab Service Tribunal, petitioner can assail the same before the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, this Court has no jurisdiction to interfere in the judgment passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal under Article 212(3) the jurisdiction is vested with the Honourable Supreme Court, appeal is provided against the judgment of Administrative Tribunal, Federal Service Tribunal or Provincial Service Tribunal.
4. Resultantly, this writ petition is not maintainable and the same is dismissed in limine. H.B.T./W-9/L Petition dismissed.