1982 PLP 229 (SCMR)
ABDUL ALEEM-Petitioner Versus MEMBER (COLONIES) BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS-Respondents
| Citation | 1982 PLP 229 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah, and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL ALEEM-Petitioner Versus MEMBER (COLONIES) BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS-Respondents |
| Primary Law | Supreme Court Rules, 1956 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1982 PLP 229 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Supreme Court Rules, 1956 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1982 PLP 229 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah, and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1982 PLP 229 (SCMR) (ABDUL ALEEM-Petitioner Versus MEMBER (COLONIES) BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 3 OTHERS-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azeem, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Aslam Chaudhary, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. .
- Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azeem, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Aslam Chaudhary, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. .
- Malik Talib Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court and Salahuddin Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 27-7-80 of the Lahore High Court in Writ Petition No. 1356 of 1979). -- O. XLIX, r. 6 read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXIII, r. 3-Compromise -- Parties arriving at a compromise, compromise fair and ending dispute between parties in amicable manner according to their wishes-Compromise directed to be given effect to by competent authorities and petition for leave to appeal disposed of as withdrawn-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3) Malik Talib Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court and Salahuddin Ahmad, Advocate-on-Record for the State. Date of bearing: 14th October 1980.
Judgment & Decree
Respondent No. 4(Talib Hussain) K. M. K. M. Killa No. 1 6‑9 Killa No. 9 2‑17 Killa No. 2 8‑9 Killa No. 3/1 4‑4 Killa No. 10 8‑18 Killa No. 8/1 4‑9 Killa No. 9 6‑1 Killa No. 11 8‑18 Killa No. 12 8‑18 Total 29-17 29-6
3. That further the petitioner and the respondent No. 4 have also agreed to share the tube‑well installed by the petitioner in the above mentioned land to the extent of 50 % (petitioner) and 50 % (respondent No. 4) respectively and two (2) kanals of the land where the tube‑well is working will be shared equally.
4. That the petitioner and the respondent No. 4 will make up their deficiency of their respective subsistence unit of land from the other available land in the same Chak or adjacent Chak. All the formalities shall be fulfilled by both the parties in accordance with law." We consider that this is a fair compromise and will end the dispute between the parties in an amicable manner, in accordance with their wishes. The compromise may, therefore, be given effect to by the competent authorities. This petition shall stand disposed of as withdrawn with the above observations, Order accordingly.