PTD 2001

2001 PLP 2802 (PTD)

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus TRUSTEES OF THE TRUST FOR RELATIVES

Jurisdiction / Court
240 I T R 12
Decided Date
Income‑tax Reference No. 31, of 1987, decided on 10th February, 1999.
Honorable Judges
Dr. B. P. Saraf and S. H. Kapadia, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2001 PLP 2802 (PTD)
Forum / Court 240 I T R 12
Bench Members Dr. B. P. Saraf and S. H. Kapadia, JJ
Parties COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus TRUSTEES OF THE TRUST FOR RELATIVES
Primary Law Income‑tax‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 2802 (PTD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Income‑tax‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 2802 (PTD)?

The case was heard and decided by the 240 I T R 12 bench comprising: Dr. B. P. Saraf and S. H. Kapadia, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 2802 (PTD) (COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus TRUSTEES OF THE TRUST FOR RELATIVES). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Income‑tax‑‑‑

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑Representative assessee ‑‑‑ Trustee ‑‑‑ Assessment‑ ‑‑‑Beneficiaries under trust deed‑‑‑Specified persons with determined shares‑‑‑Section 164(1) not applicable‑‑‑Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.164. The assessee was a trust and under clause 5(b) of the trust deed the beneficiaries were persons who were known and whose shares were specified. The assessee claimed that it was not a discretionary trust and hence the provisions of section 164(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, would not apply. The Incometax Officer rejected the claim. The Tribunal allowed the claim. On a reference: Held, that the beneficiaries of the trust were specified persons having determined shares. The income of the trust had been distributed to three beneficiaries. The beneficiaries had included their shares of income in their individual returns and had paid taxes thereon Hence, section 164(1) of the Act was not applicable. R.V. Desai with B.M. Chattarjee for the Commissioner

Judgment & Decree

S.H. KAPADIA, J.‑‑‑At the instance of the Department, the Incometax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question of law for the opinion of this Court for the assessment year 1978‑79 under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and having regard to the terms of the trust deed, dated May 5, 1973, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assesseetrust in not a discretionary trust and consequently the provisions of section 164(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are not applicable?" The assessee claimed before the Incometax Officer that the section 164(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"), was not applicable in the case of the assesseetrust. The Incometax Officer did not agree with the claim of the assessee. Being aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter before the Commissioner of Incometax (Appeals), who allowed the claim of the assessee. The Commissioner of Incometax (Appeals) found that the trust was created by Mrs. Suneeti Raje A. Apte on May 9, 1973; that the beneficiaries finder clause 5(b) of the deed were persons who are known and whose shares were specified. Under the above circumstances, the Commissioner of Incometax (Appeals) allowed the claim of the assessee, Being aggrieved, the Department came in appeal before the Incometax Appellate Tribunal (the "Tribunal"). Before the Tribunal, the learned representative of the assessee relied upon the order of the Tribunal in I.T.A. No.3103/Bom. of 1980, dated August 24, 1981, in the case of the same assessee wherein the claim of the assessee was allowed. Following the order of the Tribunal in the case of the same assessee for the earlier year 1977‑78, the view taken by the Commissioner of Incometax (Appeals) came to be confirmed. Under the above circumstances, reference has come before this Court for opinion. At the outset, it may be mentioned that the order of the Tribunal in respect of the earlier assessment year 1977‑78 has not been annexed to the paper book. As stated hereinabove, the above question referred for opinion of this Court in the present reference concerns the assessment year 1978‑79. The trust was created on May 9, 1973. The beneficiaries to the income are specified persons having determined shares. The income of the trust for the assessment year 1978‑79 has been distributed to three beneficiaries. The beneficiaries have included their shares of income in their individual returns and have paid taxes thereon. Following the order of the Tribunal in the case of this very assessee for the earlier assessment year 1977‑78 the order of the Commissioner of Incometax (Appeals) was confirmed by the Tribunal in the present case. Situated thus, there is no material before us to hold $hat section 164(1) of the Act is applicable in the present case. To repeat, the order of the Tribunal for the earlier assessment year 1977‑78 has also not been placed before this Court. Hence, the above question is answered in the affirmative and against the Department. The reference is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs M.B.A./286/FC Order accordingly.