1968S3181 (PLP)
N/A
| Citation | 1968S3181 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | N/A |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968S3181 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968S3181 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1968S3181 (PLP) (N/A). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- M. B. Zaman, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Shaukat All, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Khalilur Rahman, Attorney for Petitioners.
Judgment & Decree
Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 5(3)‑--Conviction under S. 307, P. P. C.‑‑Question involved being one of mere appreciation of evidence‑--Special leave to appeal declined by Supreme Court. M. B. Zaman, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Shaukat All, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Khalilur Rahman, Attorney for Petitioners. Nemo for the State. Date of hearing: 30th May 1968. FAZAL-E-AKBAR, J.‑The petitioners Ghulam Rasool and Bashir Ahmad stand convicted under section 307/34 of the Pakistan Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years each. Their convictions rest on the evidence of Wali Muhammad (P. W. 1), who was target of the shot, and Mst. Emna (P. W. 2), who was inmate of the house. The Courts below have, for good and sufficient reasons, accepted their evidence. The points raised by the learned counsel merely go to the appreciation of the evidence. Following our usual practice we decline to re‑examine the evidence for the third time in the absence of any illegality of procedure or violation of any principle in appreciation of evidence. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Leave refused.