YLR 2007

2007 PLP 1912 (YLR)

MUHAMMAD KHALIL — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
Fazal-e-Miran Chauhan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2007 PLP 1912 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Fazal-e-Miran Chauhan, J
Parties MUHAMMAD KHALIL — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 1912 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 1912 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Fazal-e-Miran Chauhan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 1912 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD KHALIL — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Syed Iqbal Hussain Gillani for Petitioner.

Judgment & Decree

FAZAL-E-MIRAN CHAUHAN, J.

The petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.695, dated 30-8-2006 registered under section 10(2) of Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, No.VII of 1979 and 450, P.P.C. at Police Station, Satellite Town Sargodha.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is falsely involved in the case; that as per allegation the petitioner was holding the victim of her hands facilitating the co-accused to commit zina with her; that the petitioner has been declared innocent by the local police; that no mark of violence was found on the body of the victim; that she was medically examined. According to the report of the chemical examiner the swabs were not stained with semen. The petitioner as per school certificates was of 12 1/2 years of age at the time of occurrence. As per Investigating Officer no such occurrence had taken place and the petitioner was found innocent. Cancellation report of the case is pending.

3. Conversely, learned counsel for the State half heartedly opposed the petition.

4. Heard. Record perused.

5. As per allegation the petitioner was holding the hands of victim facilitating the co-accused to commit zina with her but the petitioner has been declared innocent by the local police; that no mark of violence was found on the body of the victim. She was medically examined. According to the report of the chemical examiner the swabs were not stained with semen. The petitioner as per school leaving certificate was of 12-1/2 years of age at the time of occurrence. As per Investigating Officer after recording the statements of the residents of Mohallah that no occurrence had taken place, the petitioner was declared innocent.

6. Tit view of the above, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is admitted to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.30,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./M-85/L Bail granted.