1989 PLP 1486 (SCMR)
PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1486 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan,JJ |
| Parties | PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1486 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1486 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan,JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1486 (SCMR) (PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- S.M. Zubair, AA.‑G., Punjab and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑ Record for Petitioner.
- Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 2nd July, 1988.
- The question raised before us by the Additional Advocate‑General pertains to the jurisdiction of the High Court which needs examination.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of. Lahore High Court, dated 23‑11‑1980 b Writ Petition No.10231 of 1960). ‑‑‑Arts.199 & 212(3)‑‑High Court, in its Constitutional jurisdiction, declared order of suspension of civil servant as of no legal effect‑‑Leave to appeal granted to examine question pertaining to the jurisdiction of the High Court.
Judgment & Decree
GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑Province of the Punjab through Secretary Agriculture Department seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, dated 23‑11‑1980 whereby Constitution petition filed by Muhammad Nawaz was accepted and order of suspension of Muhammad Nawaz held to be of no legal effect. The question raised before us by the Additional Advocate‑General pertains to the jurisdiction of the High Court which needs examination. Leave is granted accordingly. Appeal to be prepared on the present record. Parties are permitted to file additional documents, if any, within two months. M.B.A./P‑93/S Leave granted.