SCMR 2002

2002 PLP 1870 (SCMR)

NOOR MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE and others‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
Munir A. Sheikh, Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Ramday and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2002 PLP 1870 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Munir A. Sheikh, Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Ramday and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, JJ
Parties NOOR MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE and others‑‑‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 1870 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 1870 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Munir A. Sheikh, Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Ramday and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 1870 (SCMR) (NOOR MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Syed Sardar Shah Bukhari, Advocate Supreme Court with Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on-Record for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondents.

Judgment & Decree

MUNIR A. SHEIKH, J.‑‑‑Review is sought on the ground that law declared by this Court in a reported judgment that it was not necessary to mention in the plaint the names of witnesses before whom Talb‑i‑Muwathibat was made and also the date and place when it was made has not been, followed. Argument has no force. It was held in the judgment under Review that witnesses examined by the petitioner were not trustworthy, therefore, their evidence was rightly disbelieved and the suit dismissed as such no case of review has been made out as the petitioner wants rehearing of the case which is not permissible in review jurisdiction. Dismissed. Q.M.H./N‑70/S Petition dismissed.