1999 PLP 3185 (MLD)
ARSHAD JAWAID KHAN — Petitioner Versus KARACHI TELECOMMUNICATION REGION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through General Manager-1, (South) and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1999 PLP 3185 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ARSHAD JAWAID KHAN — Petitioner Versus KARACHI TELECOMMUNICATION REGION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through General Manager-1, (South) and others — Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 3185 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 3185 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 3185 (MLD) (ARSHAD JAWAID KHAN — Petitioner Versus KARACHI TELECOMMUNICATION REGION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through General Manager-1, (South) and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Umar Qureshi for Respondents Nos. 1 to 4.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Petitioner applied for appointment in Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation in time but in spite of his earlier clearance of requisite test/qualification, application was not duly processed-- Authorities made number of offers/commitments in their statement which were accepted by the petitioner
High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn but recorded the contents of the statement made by respondents as undertaking given in Court.
Judgment & Decree
Constitutional Petition No. 760-D, Miscellaneous Nos. 1670 and 3851 of 1995, decided on 13th March, 1998.
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Petitioner applied for appointment in Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation in time but in spite of his earlier clearance of requisite test/qualification, application was not duly processed-- Authorities made number of offers/commitments in their statement which were accepted by the petitioner
High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn but recorded the contents of the statement made by respondents as undertaking given in Court. Petitioner in person. Muhammad Umar Qureshi for Respondents Nos. 1 to
4. The learned counsel for the respondents, upon hearing, has submitted a statement which is singed by the relevant officers of P. T. C. L. as also by himself. It having been established during the course of hearing that Ole petitioner, as reflected in the earlier orders of the Court, had applied for appointment in P. T. C. L. in time but that in spite of his earlier clearance of the requisite test/qualification his application was not duly processed, the respondents; through the statement submitted today have made various commitments, such that the petitioner has choice to accept the same and to withdraw the petition. The petitioner had examined the said statement and accepted the terms thereof. provided that the same are strictly acted upon by the respondents and besides that on account of the petitioner agitating his grievance he is in no way victimized for mala fide reasons. The respondents assure the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn but the contents of the above statements are recorded as undertakings of the respondents tendered in this Court. Q.M.H./M.A.K./A-234/K Petition dismissed.