2000 P Cr (PLP)
Mst. SAHIBZADI and 8 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2000 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J |
| Parties | Mst. SAHIBZADI and 8 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2000 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2000 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2000 P Cr (PLP) (Mst. SAHIBZADI and 8 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Malik Muhammad Shabbir Langrial for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
Penal Code (XLV of 186(0)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S. 337‑F(v)/337‑F(ii)/337‑F(i)/148/149‑‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.561‑A=‑‑Quashing of order‑‑‑Accused had been summoned in the private complaint by the Magistrate by means of the impugned order to face the trial‑‑‑Quashing of the said order was sought by the accused on the grounds that the injuries alleged to have been caused to the witnesses in the complaint were found by the Medical Board to be self‑suffered and that the complaint case had been filed after an unexplained delay of two years as a counterblast to the F.I.R. got registered by the accused against the complainant party which was pending‑‑‑Accused were directed to appear before the Magistrate and make an application before him under S.249‑A, Cr.P.C. which was an adequate remedy‑‑‑Magistrate was directed to decide the said application within a fortnight‑‑Petition was disposed of accordingly. 1997 SCMR 292; 1989 PCr.LJ 478; 1989 PCr.LJ 913 and 1993 PCr.LJ 2540 ref.
Judgment & Decree
The learned counsel for the petitioner in support of this petition submits that a case F.I.R. No.3 of 1997 was registered in Police Station, Chab Kahan, District Khanewal against respondent No.1 and nine others, which is still pending adjudication. .He submits that now after two years a complaint has been filed by respondent No. l in the Court of respondent No.2 against the petitioners in which they have been summoned by the learned Magistrate for 13‑10‑1998 vide his order, dated 25‑7‑1998.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners in support of this petition submits that allegedly two persons have been shown injured in the complainant case namely Ghulam ‑Farid and Shaban. His contention is that nature of injuries are self‑suffered and in this regard a Medical Board was constituted. Ghulam Farid had appeared before the Medical Board and it was the unanimous opinion of the Board that his injury was self‑suffered, while Shaban did not appear which shows his guilty mind. He further submits that there is an unexplained delay in filing this complaint. He also submits that this complaint is counter‑blast to the case F.I.R. No.3 of 1997. He has relied upon 1997 SCMR 292, 1989 PCr.LJ 478 and 1989 PCr.LJ
913. He has also relied upon 1993 PCr.LJ 2540.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Be that it may, petitioners are directed to appear before respondent No.2 and to make an application under section 249‑A, Cr.P.C., which is an adequate remedy, who should decide the same within fortnight after filing of this application.
2. Allowed subject to all just legal exceptions and disposed of. C.M.No.2 of 1998. No ground. dismissed. N.H.Q./S-16/L Order accordingly