2001 PLP 2878 (YLR)
Mst. RAZIA BIBI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2001 PLP 2878 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Zafar Pasha Chaudhry, J |
| Parties | Mst. RAZIA BIBI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 2878 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 2878 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Zafar Pasha Chaudhry, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 2878 (YLR) (Mst. RAZIA BIBI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Pervaiz Aslam Chaudhry for Petitioner.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302/109/34‑‑‑Bail‑‑‑Accused according to complainant was holding a match box in her hand and subsequently the deceased was set ablaze by her‑‑‑Deceased in her statement recorded in the hospital had also stated that the accused had set her on fire‑‑‑Occurrence admittedly had taken place in the house of the accused as the deceased was her daughter‑in -law being the wife of her son who was co-accused in the case‑‑‑Accused had committed a heinous offence of burning her daughter‑in- law in her own house‑‑‑Bail was declined to accused in circumstances. Pervaiz Aslam Chaudhry for Petitioner. Mirza Abdullah Baig for the State. Mst. Razia Bibi petitioner stands accused of an offence under sections 302/109/34, P.P.C. vide F.I.R. No. 320 of 2000 registered with Police Station Nishter Colony, Lahore, on 10‑10‑2000.
2. It has been alleged by the complainant who is an eye‑witness of the occurrence that the petitioner was holding a match in her hand and subsequently Mst. Maryam deceased was set ablaze. The statement of Mst. Maryam was also recorded in the hospital. She too had accused the petitioner of setting her on fire. Admittedly, the occurrence took place in the house of the petitioner as deceased was her daughter‑in- law being wife of co‑accused Bhula her son. As the petitioner has committed a heinous offence of burning her daughter‑in‑law in her own house, I am not inclined to admit her to bail. This petition is, therefore, dismissed. N.H.Q./R‑85/L Bail refused.