2008 PLP 131 (YLR)
Executive and 3 others — Plaintiffs Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Government Sindh, Karachi
| Citation | 2008 PLP 131 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Zia Perwez, J |
| Parties | Executive and 3 others — Plaintiffs Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Government Sindh, Karachi |
| Primary Law | Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 131 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 131 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Zia Perwez, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 131 (YLR) (Executive and 3 others — Plaintiffs Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Government Sindh, Karachi). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 42
Sindh Urban State Land (Cancellation 'of Allotments, Conversions and Exchanges) Ordinance (III of 2001), Ss.3 & 4
Suit for allotment of alternate land
Subject-matter of suit which was allotment of alternate land and was disputed by defendants, had already become infructuous by operation) of law after promulgation of Sindh Urban State Land (Cancellation of Allotments, Conversions and Exchanges) Ordinance, 2001
Suit was dismissed having become infructuous
If plaintiff, was aggrieved, he could pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum under said Ordinance. Nemo for Plaintiffs. Abbas Ali, A.A.-G. for the State. Manzoor Ahmed for the Defendant No.8. Abdul Karim Khan for the alleged Contemnors. Muhammad Jamil for Khalil-ur-Rehman for Defendants Nos. 13-32.
Judgment & Decree
ZIA PERWEZ, J.
None is present on behalf of the plaintiffs. None is attending this case on behalf of the plaintiffs for last many dates. On earlier occasion, adjournments have been sought, and granted, on behalf of the counsel for the plaintiff.
2. The learned A. A-G. states that the subject-matter of this suit, which is allotment of alternate land, disputed by the defendants, has already become infructuous by operation of law after promulgation of Sindh Urban State Land (Cancellation of Allotments, Conversions and Exchanges) Ordinance, 2001.
3. Accordingly, this suit is dismissed having become infructuous. The plaintiff, if aggrieved, may pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum under the Ordinance of 2001. All the pending applications are also dismissed. H.B.T./H-25/K Suit dismissed.