1986 PLP (1) (SCMR)
S. JAMIL AHMED HASHMI — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP (1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S.A. Nusrat, JJ |
| Parties | S. JAMIL AHMED HASHMI — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP (1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP (1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S.A. Nusrat, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP (1) (SCMR) (S. JAMIL AHMED HASHMI — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Shahudul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 16th February, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Federal Service Tribunal Karachi, dated 27-2-1984 passed in Appeal No. 17(K) of 1982).
Art. 212(3)--Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4--Removal from service--Judgment of Service Tribunal that petitioner was proved to be guilty of charges framed against him unexceptionable in law or on facts--Leave refused. Petitioner in person.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑This is a petition for leave to appeal from the judgment of Federal Service Tribunal, dated 27‑2‑1984 dismissing petitioner's appeal and thereby upholding the order of his removal from service.
2. We have heard the petitioner who appears in person, and have gone through the record of the case. We find that no exception can be taken in law or on facts against the judgment of the Service Tribunal that the petitioner was proved to be guilty of the charges framed against him.
3. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. M . Y . H . Petition dismissed.