1990 P Cr (PLP)
ASHRAF alias ACHHOO — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1990 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ASHRAF alias ACHHOO — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 P Cr (PLP) (ASHRAF alias ACHHOO — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Khan Muhammad Virk and Pervaiz I. Mir for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 307, 324, 326, 379, 427 & 148/149
Accused was suffering from renal colic and was admitted in jail hospital
No direct motive or specific injury was attributed to accused
No recovery was effected from accused
Accused alongwith others was responsible for causing injuries to a witness
Accused was in jail for about 1-1/2 years and the trial had not commenced
Bail was allowed in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Ashraf alias Achhoo petitioner along with 8 others stands charged with the murder of Abdul Hameed deceased and for murderously assaulting Qasim P.W. with a hatchet, sticks and firearms on 5-6-1988. The motive for the offence was that Abdul Hameed deceased had contested Local Bodies Election against Ashiq co-accused and had defeated him.
2. The petitioner was alleged to be armed with a .12 bore gun. He had earlier applied for bail but his application was dismissed on 12-2 1989. He has applied again forbail on merits as well as sickness. It was stated on his behalf that he was admitted in District Jail Hospital, Gujranwala. A report was called from the Medical Officer, Central Jail, Gujranwala. He has reported that the petitioner is suffering from renal colic and is admitted in jail hospital. 3.On merits it is stated that no direct motive is attributed to the petitioner, that no specific injury is attributed to him and that no recovery has been effected from him. The specific injuries are attributed to Ashiq, Waris, Arif, Mahmood Munawar and Imtiaz co-accused. The allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith others caused injuries to Muhammad Oasim P.W. He is behind the bars since June 1988. The trial has not commenced as yet. Keeping in view the above circumstances particularly his health, I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.30,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Gujranwara. S.A./A-932/L Bail granted.