2006 PLP 381 (YLR)
FAISAL RAZA — Petitioner Versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through Chancellor and 2 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2006 PLP 381 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Nawaz Bhatti, J |
| Parties | FAISAL RAZA — Petitioner Versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through Chancellor and 2 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Educational Institution |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 381 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Educational Institution as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 381 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Nawaz Bhatti, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 381 (YLR) (FAISAL RAZA — Petitioner Versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through Chancellor and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Zafar Ullah Khan Khakwani for Petitioner.
- Malik Muhammad Tariq Rajwana for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
Overlapping in examination
Petitioner had contended that overlapping in examination, had resulted in his missing the chances which were available to him and which now needed to be determined by the University
University stated that such matters were to be determined by Syndicate of the University
Constitutional petition was disposed of with observation that petitioner might approach the Syndicate of University with an appropriate application explaining his grievance and if such application vas made, same would be considered and decided by the Syndicate in accordance with law
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ BHATTI, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after making some submissions states that his contention that there was overlapping in the examinations, resulting in his client missing the chances which were available to him, needs to be determined by the competent authority of the respondent-University.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that such matters are to be determined by the Syndicate of the University.
3. Instant writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the observation that let the petitioner approach the Syndicate of the University with an appropriate application stating and explaining the grievance and if such an application is made, the same shall be considered and decided by the Syndicate, in accordance with law. H.B.T./F-142/L??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Order accordingly.