1995 PLP 1258 (MLD)
MUMTAZ HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1995 PLP 1258 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Rana Muhammad Arshad, J |
| Parties | MUMTAZ HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 1258 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 1258 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Rana Muhammad Arshad, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 1258 (MLD) (MUMTAZ HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Malik Allah Yar Khan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S.426(1)‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337‑A(i), 337‑F(i) & 354‑‑ Suspension of sentence‑‑‑Sentence of six months' R.I. awarded to accused was short and there was no likelihood of the fixation of his revision petition in the near future for final decision‑‑‑Sentence of accused was suspended in circumstances and he was released on bail accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
This is a revision against conviction and sentence. ..
2. Admit. Notice and record. Criminal Miscellaneous No.2 of 1995.
3. This is a petition for suspension of the operation of judgment, dated 25‑9‑1994 and 15‑1‑1995, passed by M.I.C., Shahpur and Additional Sessions Judge, Sargodha respectively whereby the petitioner was convicted under section 337‑A(i) 337‑F(i) and 354, P.P.C. and sentenced for six months' R.I. on each count. The sentence, was however, ordered to run concurrently.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sentence awarded to the petitioner is short one, and which will probably run over prior to the fixation of revision petition for regular hearing.
5. The learned counsel for the state has also not controverted the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
6. Since the sentence is short and there is no likelihood for the fixation of the revision petition in the near future, the same is, therefore, suspended till the final decision of the revision petition. The petitioner be released from Jail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.
7. Criminal Miscellaneous No.2 of 1995 stands disposed of. N.H.Q./M‑2048/L Sentence suspended.