2004 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD TARIQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Malik GOHAR REHMAN and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2004 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | Qazi Ehsanullah Qureshi, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD TARIQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Malik GOHAR REHMAN and another‑‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: Qazi Ehsanullah Qureshi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD TARIQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Malik GOHAR REHMAN and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Faroddon Khan Jadoon, for Petitioner.
- Muhammad Ayub Khan, D.A.‑G./Special Prosecutor of A.N.F. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 8th October, 2001.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.411/420/458/471‑‑‑Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.14‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused after his arrest had made a voluntary confessional statement admitting his guilt and that of his co‑accused‑‑ Accused was also involved in many other cases of such‑like nature and he seemed to be a habitual offender which had made the conduct of accused doubtful‑‑‑Prima facie reasonable grounds existed for believing that accused appeared to be connected with crime with which he was charged‑‑‑Co‑accused was main accused in the case at whose instance and behest the crime was committed and said co‑accused was granted bail by Trial Court‑‑‑Keeping in view the role played by said co‑accused in the commission of crime, suo motu notice was issued to him as to why his bail should not be cancelled. Malik Masoodur Rehman Awan for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 100 of 2001, decided on 8th October, 2001. Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.411/420/458/471‑‑‑Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.14‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused after his arrest had made a voluntary confessional statement admitting his guilt and that of his co‑accused‑‑ Accused was also involved in many other cases of such‑like nature and he seemed to be a habitual offender which had made the conduct of accused doubtful‑‑‑Prima facie reasonable grounds existed for believing that accused appeared to be connected with crime with which he was charged‑‑‑Co‑accused was main accused in the case at whose instance and behest the crime was committed and said co‑accused was granted bail by Trial Court‑‑‑Keeping in view the role played by said co‑accused in the commission of crime, suo motu notice was issued to him as to why his bail should not be cancelled. Faroddon Khan Jadoon, for Petitioner. Muhammad Ayub Khan, D.A.‑G./Special Prosecutor of A.N.F. for Respondents. Malik Masoodur Rehman Awan for the Complainant. Date of hearing: 8th October, 2001.