1985 P Cr (PLP)
Mst. ANWAR BIBI Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
| Citation | 1985 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nisar, J |
| Parties | Mst. ANWAR BIBI Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 P Cr (PLP) (Mst. ANWAR BIBI Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sardar Nazar Hussain Dogar for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34‑‑Accused and her near relatives murdering her mother and her paramour‑‑Bail sought on ground that her two co‑accused had already been granted bail‑‑Accused having a one year old baby who was also confined in jail‑‑Entire family of accused having been roped in‑‑Occurrence appearing to be result of grave and sudden provocation‑‑Accused having a suckling child, held, was entitled to bail. Muhammad Shah Nawaz Khan for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34‑‑Accused and her near relatives murdering her mother and her paramour‑‑Bail sought on ground that her two co‑accused had already been granted bail‑‑Accused having a one year old baby who was also confined in jail‑‑Entire family of accused having been roped in‑‑Occurrence appearing to be result of grave and sudden provocation‑‑Accused having a suckling child, held, was entitled to bail. Sardar Nazar Hussain Dogar for Petitioner. Muhammad Shah Nawaz Khan for the State. The petitioner alongwith her husband, sister and brother stands charged with the murder of her mother Mat. Khurshid Bibi and her paramour Niamat Ali on 23‑8‑1984. The petitioner was allegedly armed with a Chhuri which he used on both the deceased.
2. The motive for the offence was that Mst. Khurshid Bibi, mother of the petitioner had eloped with Niamat Ali deceased about 8/10 years ago. Since about 1 months before the occurrence, they came back to the village of the petitioner and started living together in a separate house. The petitioner and her brother, sister and husband could not tolerate that and they‑killed both of them. The occurrence was witnessed by Bashir Ahmad, Fazal Karim and Shah Muhammad. Bashir Ahmad has filed an affidavit to the effect that he did not see any occurrence.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that Mst. Sarwar Bibil and Waliayat co‑accused are already on bail. It is also stated that the petitioner has a one year old baby, who is also confined in the jail. He further states that the entire family has been roped in. It is next stated that even from the prosecution case it appears that the occurrence was the result of grave and sudden provocation.
4. The petitioner has a suckling child. Accordingly, I admit her to bail in the sum of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C., Faisalabad. M.A.K Bail granted