PCRLJ 2008

2008 P Cr (PLP)

Haji MURAD ALI JAFERI — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
5h March, 2008
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2008 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties Haji MURAD ALI JAFERI — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER and another — Respondents
Primary Law Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 P Cr (PLP) (Haji MURAD ALI JAFERI — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Representation

  • Nemo for Petitioner.
  • Syed Hasnain Kazmi, A.A.-G. for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 420/468/471

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199

Constitutional petition

Quashing of F.I.R.

Police report had already been submitted in the case and the matter was sub judice before the Magistrate

Alleged offence according to F.I.R. was prima facie, made out against the accused

Constitutional petition was held to be not maintainable in circumstances and the same was disposed of accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD AKRAM QURESHI, J.

While relying upon the case reported as Dr. Ghulam Mustafa v. The State and another 2008 SCMR 76, learned A.A.-G. submits that the report of the police has already been submitted in this case and that the matter is sub judice before the learned Illaqa Magistrate. He further informs the Court that after submission of the police report, this Court cannot lay its hand for the quashment of the F.I.R. He further submits that from the perusal of the F.I.R. prima facie, commission of the alleged offence is made out and thus, the present writ petition is not entertainable.

2. Considering the submission of learned A.A.-G. present writ petition is declared to be not maintainable and thus, it is disposed of I accordingly. N.H.Q./M-43/L Petition dismissed.