1986 PLP 1107 (SCMR)
Ch. MIAN KHAN — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONES, ISLAMABAD — Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1107 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | ---Art. 212--Petitioner compulsorily retired on account of disciplinary action--Contention, amongst others, that inquiry report was not supplied to petitioner before impugned action taken, requiring consideration- Leave to appeal granted to consider questions.--Civil service. |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ |
| Parties | Ch. MIAN KHAN — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONES, ISLAMABAD — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1107 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1107 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the ---Art. 212--Petitioner compulsorily retired on account of disciplinary action--Contention, amongst others, that inquiry report was not supplied to petitioner before impugned action taken, requiring consideration- Leave to appeal granted to consider questions.--Civil service. bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1107 (SCMR) (Ch. MIAN KHAN — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONES, ISLAMABAD — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Siddiq Siddiqi, Advocate Supreme Court and Advocate- on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 7th April, 1986.
- Muhammad Siddiq Siddiqi, Advocate Supreme Court and Advocate- on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, dated 12-2-1984 in Appeal No. 94(R) of 1982).
Art. 212--Petitioner compulsorily retired on account of disciplinary action--Contention, amongst others, that inquiry report was not supplied to petitioner before impugned action taken, requiring consideration- Leave to appeal granted to consider questions.--[Civil service]. Syed Mir Muhammad v. N.-W.F.P. Government through Chef Secretary P L D 1981 S C 176; Federation of Pakistan and 2 others v. Abdul Razzaq 1983 S C M R 229 rel.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment, dated 12‑2‑1984 of the Federal Service Tribunal; whereby petitioner's service appeal against order of his compulsory retirement on account of disciplinary action, was dismissed. Learned counsel, amongst others, has contended that the inquiry report was not supplied to the petitioner before the impugned action was taken. He has, in this behalf, relied on Syed Mir Muhammad v. N.‑W. F. P., Government through Chief Secretary P L D 1981 S C 176 and Federation of Pakistan and 2 others v. Abdul Razzaq 1983 SCMR
229. This question, amongst others, raised needs consideration. Leave to appeal accordingly is granted. The appeal shall be prepared on the same record with liberty to the parties to file additional documents, if necessary. The appeal arising out of this petition will be heard with similar other service matters wherein the question of non‑supply of inquiry report is involved. M. Y. H. Leave granted.