SCMR 1994

1994 PLP 664 (SCMR)

Mst. SARWAR JAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus AYUB and another‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 96 of 1993, decided on 28th November, 1993.
Honorable Judges
Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ., Fazal Ilahi Khan and
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 PLP 664 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ., Fazal Ilahi Khan and
Parties Mst. SARWAR JAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus AYUB and another‑‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 664 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 664 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ., Fazal Ilahi Khan and.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 664 (SCMR) (Mst. SARWAR JAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus AYUB and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑

Representation

  • Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 28th November, 1993.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment of the Peshawar High Court, dated 4‑10‑1993, in Cr.M.Q.2/1993). ‑‑‑‑S. 561‑A‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether the order of Additional Sessions Judge enhancing the sentence imposed upon the convicts by the Trial Court was appealable, if so whether High Court under S. 561‑A, Cr.P.C. could set aside the order of Additional Sessions Judge passed in exercise of revisional jurisdiction.

Judgment & Decree

MANZOOR HUSSAIN SIAL, J: ‑‑Leave to appeal is granted in this case, to consider whether, the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Haripur, dated 15‑12‑1992, enhancing the sentence imposed upon the convicts by the trial Court, was appealable, if so whether jurisdiction under section 561‑A, Cr.P.C. could set aside the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, passed in exercise of revisional jurisdiction. N.H.Q/S‑800/S Leave granted.