1986 PLP 2362 (MLD)
Hav. INAYATULLAH — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD and another — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 2362 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Board of Revenue Sind |
| Bench Members | Amir Yusuf Ali Khan, Senior Member |
| Parties | Hav. INAYATULLAH — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 2362 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 2362 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Board of Revenue Sind bench comprising: Amir Yusuf Ali Khan, Senior Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 2362 (MLD) (Hav. INAYATULLAH — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Anwar Baig Mirza for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S.164--Land Grant Policy, para. 6--Revisional jurisdiction, exercise of--Land granted to petitioner in 1964--Grant cancelled without issuing of show-cause notice--Board of Revenue in exercise of revisional jurisdiction restored land to petitioner with direction to grantee to make efforts to bring same under cultivation and fulfil all other conditions of grant.
Judgment & Decree
Case No.SROR-335 of 1981-82, decided on 8th May, 1986.
S.164--Land Grant Policy, para. 6--Revisional jurisdiction, exercise of--Land granted to petitioner in 1964--Grant cancelled without issuing of show-cause notice--Board of Revenue in exercise of revisional jurisdiction restored land to petitioner with direction to grantee to make efforts to bring same under cultivation and fulfil all other conditions of grant. Anwar Baig Mirza for Petitioner. This is a revision petition filed against the order, dated 6-1,0-1981 of the learned Additional Commissioner, Hyderabad whereby he rejected the appeal of the petitioner in respect of B. Nos. 284 and 54 area 32-00 Acres of Deh Akaro, Taluka Tando Bago and maintained the order of Revenue Officer, Kotri Barrage, Hyderabad, dated 11-6-1980. 2. The counsel for the petitioner, the representative of the M.F.R.O. and the Revenue Officer, Kotri Barrage, Hyderabad, are present and have been heard. The land is shown to be with the petitioner. The cancellation was done by the Revenue Officer, Kotri Barrage, Hyderabad simply on the recommendation of the M.F.R.O. without issuing any notice to the petitioner. It is a grant of the petitioner since 1964 and 'some instalments have been paid. The land is mostly under water. 3. I hereby allow the revision petition and restore the land under dispute in the petitioner's favour. He should make efforts to bring it under cultivation and fulfil all other conditions of grant. A.A Grant restored.