1990 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD USMAN‑‑Petitioner Versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Ajmal Mian and Saleem Akhtar, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD USMAN‑‑Petitioner Versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Ajmal Mian and Saleem Akhtar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD USMAN‑‑Petitioner Versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ghulam Oadir Jatoi for Petitioner.
- Sarfraz Ahmad, Addl. A.‑G. for Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.
- Date of hearing: 1st November 1981.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 491‑‑‑Application against illegal detention‑‑‑Police official in compliance with order of Court, producing detenu and stated that applicant was not detained, but was required in connection with investigation of a case pending trial in Court and that applicant was free to move as he was no more required‑‑‑Court in view of statement on part of police official clarified, that applicant was free to move and police would not tamper with freedom of applicant without having recourse to law.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 491‑‑‑Application against illegal detention‑‑‑Police official in compliance with order of Court, producing detenu and stated that applicant was not detained, but was required in connection with investigation of a case pending trial in Court and that applicant was free to move as he was no more required‑‑‑Court in view of statement on part of police official clarified, that applicant was free to move and police would not tamper with freedom of applicant without having recourse to law. Ghulam Oadir Jatoi for Petitioner. Sarfraz Ahmad, Addl. A.‑G. for Respondents Nos. 1 and
2. Date of hearing: 1st November 1981. AJMAL MIAN, J: ‑‑ This petition has been filed under section 491, Cr.P.C. read with Article 9 of the Provisional Constitution Order 1981 on the allegation that respondents Nos. 1 and 2 had illegally detained the petitioner. This Court by an order, dated 7‑10‑1981 issued Rule Nisi. In compliance with the above order, respondent No.l Mushtaq Ahmad A.S.I. Incharge of Police Station Panu Akil has produced the alleged detenu. Respondent No.l states that the petitioner has not been detained by him or respondent No.2 but was required in connection with investigation of a case, which is pending trial in the Court of Civil Judge and F.C.M. Panu Akil. Respondent No.1 further states that he has completed the investigation of the above case and he does not require the petitioner even in connection with the above pending case. and he is free to move. 1n view of the above statement it is clarified that the petitioner is free to move and respondents Nos. 1 and 2 shall not tamper with his freedom without having recourse to law. The application is disposed of accordingly. H.B.T./M‑991/K Order accordingly.