2012 PLP 211 (SCMR)
Malik AMAN and others — Appellants Versus ABDUL AZIZ through LRs. — Respondents
| Citation | 2012 PLP 211 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J. and Khilji Arif Hussain, J |
| Parties | Malik AMAN and others — Appellants Versus ABDUL AZIZ through LRs. — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan, Gulzarin Kiyani, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2012 PLP 211 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan, Gulzarin Kiyani, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2012 PLP 211 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J. and Khilji Arif Hussain, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2012 PLP 211 (SCMR) (Malik AMAN and others — Appellants Versus ABDUL AZIZ through LRs. — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Record for Appellants
- Nemo for Respondents
- Date of hearing: 14th December, 2011.
- Gulzarin Kiyani, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-
Headnotes / Summary
Arts 185(2)(d) & 185(3)
Competency of appeal or petition for leave to appeal
Value of subject matter of dispute being more than Rs. 500,000 and order of civil court having been set aside by appellate court below, appeal before Supreme Court was competent under Article 185(2)(d) of the Constitution subject to all just and legal exceptions.
Judgment & Decree
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, C.J.
On having gone through order dated 7-2-2007, passed by learned Civil Judge, Oghi, in execution proceedings and the impugned judgment dated 21-9-2011, in pursuance whereof the order of the Civil Court was set aside and the contention of the learned counsel that the value of the subject-matter is more than Rs. 500,000, we are prima facie of the opinion that, subject to all just and legal exceptions, appeal is competent under Article 185(1)(2)(d) of the Constitution, therefore, the office objection is overruled and the appeal is ordered to be entertained and processed in accordance with law. M.W.A./A-61/SC Office objection overruled.