1989 PLP 4033(1) (MLD)
AZHAR MOHSIN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 4033(1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Riaz Ahmad, J |
| Parties | AZHAR MOHSIN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 4033(1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 4033(1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Riaz Ahmad, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 4033(1) (MLD) (AZHAR MOHSIN Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Shaukat Shezhad for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Arts.3 & 4‑ Bail, grant of‑‑Statutory delay‑‑No progress in trial of case even after lapse of more than one year‑‑Case fixed for trial‑‑Trial Court directed to try case on day -to‑day basis and conclude it within three weeks‑‑Bail refused in circumstances. Rana Muhammad Saeed Ahmad Khan for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Arts.3 & 4‑ Bail, grant of‑‑Statutory delay‑‑No progress in trial of case even after lapse of more than one year‑‑Case fixed for trial‑‑Trial Court directed to try case on day -to‑day basis and conclude it within three weeks‑‑Bail refused in circumstances. Muhammad Shaukat Shezhad for Petitioner. Rana Muhammad Saeed Ahmad Khan for the State. Report sent by the learned trial Court has been perused. Report indicates, that on a number of dates of hearing, the accused was not produced from the jail. On another date of hearing, the Presiding Officer was on medical leave. Report further reveals, that the case was fixed for 4th of April, 1989.
2. The learned counsel informs that the case has now been fixed for hearing in June, 1989. More than one year has elapsed, and no progress towards the trial has yet taken place. In this view of the matter, I direct the trial Court to take up this case on day to day basis, rather than adjourning it. The learned trial Court is i, further directed to conclude the trial of this case within a period of three weeks. The learned trial Court shall also submit progress report about the conclusion of this trial to this Court. With these observations, this petition stands dismissed. SA./A‑706/L Bail refused.