SCMR 1999

1999 PLP 2822 (SCMR)

MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Petitioner Versus Mst. MUKHTARAN BIBI and 2 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Petition No.574-L of 1997, decided on 29th July, 1998.
Honorable Judges
Irshad Hasan Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1999 PLP 2822 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Irshad Hasan Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ
Parties MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Petitioner Versus Mst. MUKHTARAN BIBI and 2 others — Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 2822 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 2822 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Irshad Hasan Khan and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 2822 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Petitioner Versus Mst. MUKHTARAN BIBI and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Tassawar Hussain Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court with Ch: Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
  • Sh. Khizar Hayat, Advocate Supreme Court with Mehmood-ul-Islam, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
  • Nemo for Respondents Nos. 2 and 3.
  • Date of hearing: 29th July, 1998.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment, dated 19-2-1997 passed by the Lahore .High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 11850 of 1996).

Art. 185(3)

Pending petition for leave to appeal, parties submitted application for disposal of petition in the terms; that record of lower Court be reconstructed by producing copies of documents and proceedings etc. in their possession on the date fixed by Supreme Court; that respondent be given one opportunity to produce her complete evidence; and that time limit be fixed for disposal of ejectment petition

Such course being reasonable, petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and was disposed of in terms agreed to by the parties with direction that Trial Court should finally dispose of case by a specified date.

Judgment & Decree

IRSHAD HASAN KHAN, J.

This petition for leave to appeal is directed against .the judgment, dated 19-2-1997 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No. 11850 of 1996.

2. The learned counsel for the parties have submitted an application for disposal of the petition in the following terms:

"(i) that the record of lower Court be reconstructed by producing the copies of the documents 'and proceedings etc. in their possession on the date fixed, by this august Court. (ii) Respondent No. l be given one opportunity to produce her complete evidence. (iii) Time limit be fixed for disposal of the ejectment petition."

3. The above course appears to be reasonable. We, therefore, convert this petition into appeal and dispose of the same in terms of the said arrangement with the direction that the trial Court shall finally dispose of the case by 30th of November, 1998. The parties are directed to appear before the concerned learned Rent Controller, Lahore on 3rd of September, 1998, for further proceedings in the light of above order. H.B.T./M-252/S Order accordingly.