2005 PLP 1955 (YLR)
GHULAM ALI — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and 8 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2005 PLP 1955 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui and Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari, JJ |
| Parties | GHULAM ALI — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and 8 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 1955 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 1955 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui and Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 1955 (YLR) (GHULAM ALI — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariat, Karachi and 8 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Qurban Ali Chohan for Petitioner.
- Masood A. Noorani, Addl. Advocate-General for Respondents Sindh along with Jang Sher Rana, D.S.P., Headquarter Nawab Shah, Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Superintendent Jail Nawab Shah, Altaf S.H.O., Police Station, Sakrand, Inspector Badaruddin Syed S.H.O., Police Station, Sakrand, Nawaz Hussain, D.I.G. Prisons.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.364
Constitutional petition--Appre hension of arrest after release on bail
Petitioner, who was arrested for alleged commission of offence under S.364, P.P.C., was granted bail, but he did not furnish surety on account of apprehension that as soon he was released from jail, he would be arrested in some other case
Deputy Superintendent of Police concerned had given a very clear statement to the effect that petitioner was not required in cases apprehended by him and was not required in any other case by police
Purpose of Constitutional petition having been served, same was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Through this petition it has been alleged that the District Police Nawab Shah at the behest of some members of the ruling party is causing harassment to the petitioner, who is brother of a sitting M.P.A. and at present is a member of the opposition party. Briefly stated the relevant facts for the purpose of this petition are that Ghulam Haider was arrested in Crime No.21 of 2005 Police Station, Taluka Nawab Shah for commission of offence under section 364, P.P.C. He was granted bail by the Court on 12-5-2005. but surety was not furnished on behalf of accused Ghulam Haider Chandio, on account of apprehension that as soon as he is released from jail, he will be arrested in some other case. There was a particular apprehension of his arrest in Crime No.28 of 2002, Police Station, Sakrand under section 302, P.P.C. It is stated by Mr. Chohan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the District police had surrounded the District Jail Nawab Shah with police force in 15 mobiles. However, after issuance of notice by this Court in this petition, the police force disbursed. The surety was furnished in Crime No.21 of 2005 on 26-5-2005 and on the same day Ghulam Haider Chandio was released. Thereafter he has not been arrested in any, case. The learned counsel for the petitioner had initially expressed apprehension that Ghulam Haider may be arrested in Crime No.28 of 2002 Police Station, Sakrand and subsequently he stated that a fresh F.I.R. being Crime No.32 of 2005 has been registered at Police Station, Sakrand and there is apprehension that Ghulam Haider Chandio may be arrested in the said F.I.R. Mr. Jang Sher Rana, D.S.P., Headquarter Nawab Shah, has given a. very clear statement to the effect that Ghulam Haider Chandio is not required in Crime No.28 of 2002 or Crime No.32 of 2005 and has further stated that as of today he is not required in any other case by Nawab Shah police. In the above circumstances were are of the opinion that the purpose of the petition has been served and the petition stands disposed of accordingly, along with the listed applications. H.B.T./G-55/K Order accordingly.