1968 SCMR 498 (PLP)
Syed MUSAWAR ALI NAQVI-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SAEED AND OTHERS-Respondents
| Citation | 1968 SCMR 498 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Fazle-Akbar, J |
| Parties | Syed MUSAWAR ALI NAQVI-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SAEED AND OTHERS-Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 SCMR 498 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 SCMR 498 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: A. R. Cornelius, C. J. and Fazle-Akbar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 SCMR 498 (PLP) (Syed MUSAWAR ALI NAQVI-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SAEED AND OTHERS-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Nasiruddin Shahmir, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Vakil Ahmed Kidwal, Attorney for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents,
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Karachi Bench, Karachi, dated the 2nd June 1967, in Writ Petition No. 231 of 1967). Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), Sch., Part I-C. H. Form rejected by Settlement authorities on good and sufficient ground-Special Leave to Appeal refused by Supreme Court.
Judgment & Decree
CORNELIUS, C. J.-There is no force in this petition. The petitioner is still seeking transfer to himself of an evacuee house after his C. H. form was finally rejected by the Settlement authorities, and a writ petition against that order was rejected by the High Court in 1964. Against the latter order, he did not seek to appeal in this Court. The effort was recommenced on a fresh basis, viz., that the earlier proceedings were in respect of a different house numbered No. IA-253, whereas his case was for house No. IA-255. The Settlement Commissioner found no force at all in this allegation, as house No. IA-253 stood transferred to a different person, Mustahsan by name, who was not concerned in the earlier proceedings. House No. IA-255 stands transferred to the opponent in these proceedings, Muhammad Saeed. A writ petition moved against the Settlement order having been dismissed, leave to appeal further is sought. The question o fact raised before the Settlement authorities has been4 decided in Settlement on a good and sufficient ground again, the petitioner. His case on a C.H. form was concluded as far back as 1964. The petition is dismissed. Petition dismissed.