1975 PLP 243 (SCMR)
SAFDAR SHAH-Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1975 PLP 243 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Waheduddin Ahmed and Muhammad Gul, JJ |
| Parties | SAFDAR SHAH-Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Coda (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1975 PLP 243 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Coda (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1975 PLP 243 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Waheduddin Ahmed and Muhammad Gul, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1975 PLP 243 (SCMR) (SAFDAR SHAH-Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ---S. 498-Ball-Petitioner's bail application before High Court on ground of no witness having attributed anything incriminating to him dismissed by High Court on ground of one witness having incriminated him in crime-Case having been committed to Sessions Court for trial, proper course for petitioner, held, was to move Sessions Court for bail and Sessions Judge would not be influenced by observation made by High Court.
- Sardar Sami Hayat, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing : 10th May 1974.
- ---S. 498‑Ball‑Petitioner's bail application before High Court on ground of no witness having attributed anything incriminating to him dismissed by High Court on ground of one witness having incriminated him in crime‑Case having been committed to Sessions Court for trial, proper course for petitioner, held, was to move Sessions Court for bail and Sessions Judge would not be influenced by observation made by High Court.
- Sardar Sami Hayat, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated the 8th March 1974, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 560/B of 1974). Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
WAHEEDUDDIN AHMED, J.‑The petitioner has been committed under section 302, P. P. C. for the murder of Khurshid by Mr. Shaukat Ali. Magistrate at Class, Lahore, by order dated the 9th April 1974. The petitioner moved an application for bail on the ground that nine of the prosecution witnesses examined by the learned Inquiry Magistrate, has supported the prosecution case and no one has attributed anything incriminating to him. A learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, by order dated the 8th March 1974, has dismissed this application. After going through the evidence, he observed that Tayyab Khan P. W. 3, has named the petitioner and bas incriminated him in the crime The petitioner seeks permission to file an appeal against the said order. Sardar Sami Hayat, learned counsel for the petitioner, has admitted that the petitioner has been committed for standing, trial before the Session Court in these circumstances, the proper course for the petitioner is to move the Sessions Court for bail. If any such application is moved by the petitioner, the learned Sessions Judge will not De influenced by the observation made by the High Court, in the above‑mentioned petition. Subject to this remark, the petition is dismissed. Petition dismissed.