2010 PLP 274 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD KHALID and 3 others — Petitioners Versus Messrs SHAFIQ TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, KARACHI through Directors and 6 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2010 PLP 274 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Mrs. Yasmeen Abbasey and Syed Mahmood Alam Rizvi, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD KHALID and 3 others — Petitioners Versus Messrs SHAFIQ TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, KARACHI through Directors and 6 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 274 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 274 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Mrs. Yasmeen Abbasey and Syed Mahmood Alam Rizvi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 274 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD KHALID and 3 others — Petitioners Versus Messrs SHAFIQ TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, KARACHI through Directors and 6 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Ikram Siddiqui and Raza Hashmi for Petitioners.
- Muhammad Jamil for Respondent No.3.
- Today the matter was fixed for disposal of Miscellaneous No.8386/2007 moved by the petitioners stating that the petitioners have agreed to compensate the respondents and other encroachers, who had settled the matter outside the court in terms as narrated in the application but as Mr. Muhammad Jamil, learned counsel for respondent No.3 has no notice of this application, therefore, he claims copy of the same to go through it.
- In support of his statement enquiry conducted against those officers has been filed alongwith an application dated 3-7-2007 (Misc. No.5199/2007). It is further stated by Mr. Manzoor Ahmed that the affectees have been compensated from the very amount realised from those officers, as such the grievance of the petitioners has been resolved. Anyhow in view of the reservation made by learned counsel for respondent No.3 to the compromise application moved by the petitioners, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he withdraws C.M.A No.8386/2007 and he may be allowed a simple withdrawal of petition with no terms and conditions.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Settlement of the matter outside court
Petitioners had stated that they had agreed to compensate the respondents and other encroachers who had settled the matter outside the court in terms as narrated in the application
Grievance of the petitioners had been resolved, affectees had been compensated, delinquent officers had been penalized, the purpose of filing of the petition had been served out
Petition was disposed of as withdrawn. Manzoor Ahmed for CDGK Respondent.
Judgment & Decree
Today the matter was fixed for disposal of Miscellaneous No.8386/2007 moved by the petitioners stating that the petitioners have agreed to compensate the respondents and other encroachers, who had settled the matter outside the court in terms as narrated in the application but as Mr. Muhammad Jamil, learned counsel for respondent No.3 has no notice of this application, therefore, he claims copy of the same to go through it. Mr. Manzoor Ahmed, learned counsel for City District Government Karachi states that in compliance of the orders of this Court passed on 22-5-2007 and 17-10-2007 both City District Government, Karachi and Katchi Abadi Authority were held responsible to persons having been compensated by realising the amount from those delinquent officers, who were responsible for allowing the encroachment and declaring the road as Katchi Abadi. In support of his statement enquiry conducted against those officers has been filed alongwith an application dated 3-7-2007 (Misc. No.5199/2007). It is further stated by Mr. Manzoor Ahmed that the affectees have been compensated from the very amount realised from those officers, as such the grievance of the petitioners has been resolved. Anyhow in view of the reservation made by learned counsel for respondent No.3 to the compromise application moved by the petitioners, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he withdraws C.M.A No.8386/2007 and he may be allowed a simple withdrawal of petition with no terms and conditions. In view of the fact that grievance of the petitioners has been resolved, affectees have been compensated, delinquent officers have been penalized, the purpose of filing of this petition has been served out, hence in view of affectee moved today petition is hereby disposed of as withdrawn. H.B.T./M-140 Order accordingly.