P L D (Rev (PLP)
RAJPUT BUS AND TRANSPORT Co. Ltd., SARGODHA‑Appellant Versus REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, LAHORE and others‑Respondents
| Citation | P L D (Rev (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | RAJPUT BUS AND TRANSPORT Co. Ltd., SARGODHA‑Appellant Versus REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, LAHORE and others‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Punjab Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D (Rev (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D (Rev (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D (Rev (PLP) (RAJPUT BUS AND TRANSPORT Co. Ltd., SARGODHA‑Appellant Versus REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, LAHORE and others‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khwaja Abdur Rahim, for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
New route‑One return trip daily allowed to each of several limited: companies Objection from company already operating‑Force.
Judgment & Decree
AKHTER HUSSAIN, F. C.‑This is an appeal against reso lution No. 27 passed by the Regional Transport Authority, Lahore on 20th August 1951 by which they allowed three Transport Companies‑The Muslim Bus Service Sargodha, The Sargodha‑Bhera Bus Service, Sargodha, and The Rajput Bus and Transport Company Ltd., Sargodha too perate one return trip daily each from Shahpur to Bhera via Jhawarian a new route. The learned counsel for the appellant has argued that since they were already operating on Sargodha and Jhawarian via Lak and between Sargodha and Shahpur no other company should have been given any permit on the new route and they alone were entitled to operate between Shahpur and Bhera. I find no force in these arguments and the fact that each limited company has been given a share in the new route as it should be. I, therefore, reject this appeal. Announced. A. H. Appeal rejected.