1987 PLP 1753(1) (SCMR)
ABDUL SATTAR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus KHUDA‑E‑DAD‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1753(1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Kadir Shaikh, S. A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL SATTAR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus KHUDA‑E‑DAD‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1753(1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1753(1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Shaikh, S. A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1753(1) (SCMR) (ABDUL SATTAR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus KHUDA‑E‑DAD‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Riyasat Ali for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 4th April, 1987.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S.115‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Revisional jurisdiction of High Court, exercise of‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider whether High Court was correct in law in revision application by petitioners to interfere with such parts of judgment/order of Trial Court which were not challenged.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑The question for consideration in this petition is whether the High Court was correct in law in the revision application by the petitioners to interfere with the judgment/ order of the trial Court which were not challenged. Leave is granted. Security Rs.500. Appeal will be heard on the present record during the present session. It is however open to the parties to file additional document, if any. M.I./A‑90/S Leave granted