1989 PLP 1252(1) (SCMR)
ZUBAIR AHMAD and another‑‑Petitioners Versus Ch. MUHAMMAD ABAID ULLAH and another‑‑Respondents Civil Petition
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1252(1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | ZUBAIR AHMAD and another‑‑Petitioners Versus Ch. MUHAMMAD ABAID ULLAH and another‑‑Respondents Civil Petition |
| Primary Law | Arbitration.‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1252(1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Arbitration.‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1252(1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1252(1) (SCMR) (ZUBAIR AHMAD and another‑‑Petitioners Versus Ch. MUHAMMAD ABAID ULLAH and another‑‑Respondents Civil Petition). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Aftab Iqbal Chaudhry, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners.
- Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record and Ch. Khurshid Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent No.1
- Date of hearing: 4th March, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the order of the Lahore High Court dated 11‑12‑1988 in F.A. O. No.219 of 1988). ‑‑‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal was granted in order to determine scope, duties and function of a referee or an arbitrator especially in the light of Supreme Court decision in the case of Ch. Muhammad Saleem v. Muhammad Akram and others P L D 1971 S C 516 and another decision by Lahore High Court in the case of Muhammad Hanif Khan v. Ghulam Farid Khan and others P L D 1988 Lah.
250. Ch. Muhammad Saleem v. Muhammad Akram and others P L D 1971 S C 516 and Muhammad Hanif Khan and another v. Ghulam Farid Khan and others P L D 1988 Lah. 250 ref.
Judgment & Decree
GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that it is a fit case for leave to appeal in order to determine the scope, duties and functions of a referee or an arbitrator especially in the light of decision given by this Court in the case of Ch. Muhammad Saleem v. Muhammad Akram and others (P L D 1971 S C 516) and the one cited at the Bar by the counsel for the respondents Muhammad Hanif Khan and another v. Ghulam Farid Khan and others (P L D 1988 Lah. 250). Order accordingly. Security Rs.10,000 (ten thousand) Appeal to be made ready on the present record. The parties if they so wish may file additional documents within two months. M.B.A./Z‑57/S. L Leave granted,