2008 PLP 1424 (MLD)
ABDUL RASHEED and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2008 PLP 1424 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ABDUL RASHEED and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 1424 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 1424 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 1424 (MLD) (ABDUL RASHEED and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sardar Zafar Iqbal Khan Tareen for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss: 324, 336, 337-A(ii), 337-F(v), 337-L(ii)
Complainant received a sharp-edged injury on his head which caused fracture
Complainant and prosecution witnesses sustained 16 injuries on their persons
Certified copy of the order passed by the Trial Court revealed that all the witnesses were present and statement of the complainant was recorded, but the case had to be adjourned on the request of the counsel for accused
Bail was refused in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, J.
The petitioners have sought their post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.299, registered at Police Station Liaqatpur District Rahim Yar Khan, for offences under sections 324/336/337-A(ii)/337-L(ii)/337-F(v), P.P.C.
2. The allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other accused launched criminal assault upon the complainant party and caused injuries to Riaz Ahmad-complainant as well as Muhammad Rafiq, Muhammad Irfan, Muhammad Rehan P.Ws.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a very large let has been thrown by the complainant, that the injuries attributed to the petitioners were not only simple but where also non-specific that the intention to kill is prima facie ruled out as allegedly wrong side of the hatchet was used by the accused/petitioners.
4. Conversely the learned counsel for the complainant and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State have opposed this application and have argued that four persons have received serious injuries at the hands of accused. The learned counsel have pointed out that injury on the temporal region of the head of Muhammad Rehan resulted into fracture and that due to the said injury he suffered right sided fiscal palsy.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been noticed that Riaz Ahmad-complainant received a sharp-edged injury on his head, which caused fracture, the complainant and P.Ws. sustained 16 injuries on their persons, furthermore certified copy of the order, dated 3-2-2006 passed by the learned Trial Court reveals that all the witnesses were present and statement of the complainant was recorded but the case had to be adjourned on the request of the learned counsel for the accused/petitioner's. I am not inclined to admit the petitioners to bail. Hence this petition stands disposed of. H.B.T./A-63/L Bail refused.