1993 PLP 1320 (SCMR)
YUSUF ALI KHAN, BARRISTER‑AT‑LAW‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Messrs HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1993 PLP 1320 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Abdul Shakurul Salam and Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, JJ |
| Parties | YUSUF ALI KHAN, BARRISTER‑AT‑LAW‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Messrs HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION and another‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 PLP 1320 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 PLP 1320 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Abdul Shakurul Salam and Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 PLP 1320 (SCMR) (YUSUF ALI KHAN, BARRISTER‑AT‑LAW‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Messrs HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 18th January, 1993.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 18‑11‑1992 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in C.M. No.279‑B of 1992 in C.O.S. No.37 of 1989). ‑‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑‑Leave td appeal was granted when question of statutory construction of public importance was involved. Petitioner in person.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL SHAKURUL SALAM, J: ‑‑Petitioner seeks leave to appeal against an order of a learned Judge of the Lahore High Court in C.M. No.279‑B of 1992 in C.O.S. No.37 of‑1989 dated 18‑11‑1992.
2. Contention is that under the amended law, there is no provision for transfer of pending cases and the reliance on the precedents quoted in the impugned order is not quite apt. Question of statutory construction of public importance arises in this petition. Leave to appeal is, therefore, granted. Interim order dated 4‑1‑1993 shall continue in the meanwhile. M.BA./Y‑24/S Leave granted.