1988 PLP 734 (PLC)
EMPLOYEES UNION C.B.A. Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and another
| Citation | 1988 PLP 734 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | 1st Labour Court Punjab |
| Bench Members | Salah‑ud‑Din Zafar, Presiding Officer |
| Parties | EMPLOYEES UNION C.B.A. Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and another |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 734 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 734 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the 1st Labour Court Punjab bench comprising: Salah‑ud‑Din Zafar, Presiding Officer.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 734 (PLC) (EMPLOYEES UNION C.B.A. Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- H.R. Haider for Petitioner.
- K.H. Khursheed for Respondent No.l.
- Malik Muhammad Asghar for Respondent No.2.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑Ss. 22(12) & 23‑‑Subscription of Labour union members‑‑Mode of collection‑‑Collection of subscription by employer‑Management was not prohibited by any provision of law from entering into voluntary agreement with any rival Labour Union within its Organisation to collect subscriptions toward Union's funds‑‑Such agreement with express consent of members of Union, was not directly or indirectly violative of law‑‑Petition of C. B. A. Union under section 34 for preventing deductions of subscription towards funds of rival union was dismissed by Labour Court.
Judgment & Decree
Petition No.9 of 1986, decided on 20th November, 1986. ‑‑‑Ss. 22(12) & 23‑‑Subscription of Labour union members‑‑Mode of collection‑‑Collection of subscription by employer‑Management was not prohibited by any provision of law from entering into voluntary agreement with any rival Labour Union within its Organisation to collect subscriptions toward Union's funds‑‑Such agreement with express consent of members of Union, was not directly or indirectly violative of law‑‑Petition of C. B. A. Union under section 34 for preventing deductions of subscription towards funds of rival union was dismissed by Labour Court. H.R. Haider for Petitioner. K.H. Khursheed for Respondent No.l. Malik Muhammad Asghar for Respondent No.2. The State Bank of Pakistan Employees' Union (registered) had acquired the status of C.B.A., in the State Bank through Referendum. The Friends Workers' Union is the rival