1989 PLP 709 (MLD)
GHULAM QADIR and another‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 709 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Falak Sher, J |
| Parties | GHULAM QADIR and another‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 709 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 709 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Falak Sher, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 709 (MLD) (GHULAM QADIR and another‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ‑‑‑S. 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.380‑‑Pre‑arrest bail, confirmation of‑ Earlier pre‑arrest bail granted to accused was cancelled on complainant's application on account of non‑appearance of accused‑‑Accused were allowed ad interim pre‑arrest bail on subsequent application confirmation whereof was being sought on ground that accused had no notice of date of hearing before Trial Court‑‑Ad interim pre‑arrest bail was extended by High Court so that accused should approach Sessions Court in that behalf.
- Altaf Ibrahim Oureshi for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
Rizwan Wasti for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1091‑B of 1988, decided on 17th October, 1988. ‑‑‑S. 498‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.380‑‑Pre‑arrest bail, confirmation of‑ Earlier pre‑arrest bail granted to accused was cancelled on complainant's application on account of non‑appearance of accused‑‑Accused were allowed ad interim pre‑arrest bail on subsequent application confirmation whereof was being sought on ground that accused had no notice of date of hearing before Trial Court‑‑Ad interim pre‑arrest bail was extended by High Court so that accused should approach Sessions Court in that behalf. Altaf Ibrahim Oureshi for Petitioners. Rizwan Wasti for the State. Petitioners were allowed pre‑arrest bail, by the learned Sessions Judge, Vehari, in a case registered vide F.I.R. No. 162/88, dated 3‑7‑1988 under section 380, P.P.C. at Police Station Thingi, District Vehari, which was cancelled during the course of complainant's application seeking cancellation of the bail on 28‑9 1988, on account of non‑appearance; subsequently, the present petition was moved wherein they were allowed ad interim pre‑arrest bail on 5‑10‑1988, confirmation whereof is being sought on the ground that the petitioners had no notice of the date of hearing before the Sessions Court. Be that as it may, in the context of things, I have deemed it appropriate that the petitioners should approach the Sessions Court in this behalf; consequently, the ad interim pre arrest bail granted vide the preceding order is extended upto 22‑10‑1988, in the afternoon whereof, this order shall automatically lapse. The petition stands disposed of. H.B.T./G‑201/LOrder accordingly.