1994 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD SHABBIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SHABBIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD SHABBIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Rana Shakeel Ahmad Khan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324/394
Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.17
Accused who was stated to be stranger to the complainant was not subjected to identification parade
No recovery had been effected from the accused
Case against accused, therefore, needed further enquiry
Accused was neither a previous convict nor a hardened criminal and was no longer required by police
Judgment & Decree
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324/394
Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.17
Accused who was stated to be stranger to the complainant was not subjected to identification parade
No recovery had been effected from the accused
Case against accused, therefore, needed further enquiry
Accused was neither a previous convict nor a hardened criminal and was no longer required by police
Accused was allowed bail in circumstances. Rana Shakeel Ahmad Khan for Petitioner. Muhammad Sharif Butt for the State. Date of hearing: 15th November, 1993. The petitioner is accused of offences under sections 324 and 394, P.P.C. read with section 17 of the Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, vide F.I.R. No.179/91, dated 29-9-1991, registered at Police Station Anarkali, Lahore.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the State were heard at length in respect of the contentions raised herein. It was confirmed on behalf of the State that, as contended herein, the petitioner was never subjected to identification parade and that no recovery has been effected from him. Further taking into consideration that the petitioner was stated to be stranger to the complainant herein, it is hereby observed that under such circumstances, as confirmed on behalf of the State, the case of the petitioner is duly covered by the provisions of subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. It was further confirmed on behalf of the State that the petitioner is neither a previous convict nor a hardened criminal and that he is no longer required by the police.
3. Therefore, the petitioner is hereby allowed bail in the sum of Rs.30,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty magistrate, City Lahore. N.H.Q./M-1340/L Bail allowed.