1994 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD. SHABBIR alias BHOLA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD. SHABBIR alias BHOLA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD. SHABBIR alias BHOLA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Taqi Khan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.10/11
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.109
Case of accused appeared to be at par with that of co-accused who had already been allowed bail by High Court
Accused was in jail for the last five months
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2062/B of 1994, decided on 16th May, 1994.
S. 497
Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.10/11
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.109
Case of accused appeared to be at par with that of co-accused who had already been allowed bail by High Court
Accused was in jail for the last five months
Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances. Muhammad Taqi Khan for Petitioner. Ch. Muhammad Ayub with Farooq Bedar, Addl. A: G. for the State. The petitioner Muhammad Shabbir seeks his post-arrest bail in a case registered against him and others under sections 10 and 11 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 read with section 109, P.P.C. at Police Station Sangla Hill, District Sheikhupura. It is argued by the learned counsel that Muhammad Malik co-accused of the petitioner was admitted to bail by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1795/B of 1994 on 2-5-1.994. It is submitted that case of the present petitioner is at par with that of Muhammad Malik. The bail petition has not been opposed by the learned Law Officer and the learned State counsel on the ground of consistency.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record, The case of the petitioner appears to be at par with that of Muhammad Malik who was allowed bail by this Court on 2-5-1994. The A petitioner is in jail for the last five months. This being so, he is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Sheikhupura. The bail petition is accordingly allowed. N.H.Q./M-1640/L Bail allowed.