CLC 2021

2021 PLP 544 (CLC)

Haji CHRAGUDDIN — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Secretary and 5 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
Decided Date
2019-January-9
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2021 PLP 544 (CLC)
Forum / Court Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
Bench Members N/A
Parties Haji CHRAGUDDIN — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Secretary and 5 others — Respondents
Primary Law Sindh Environmental Protection Act (VIII of 2014)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2021 PLP 544 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Sindh Environmental Protection Act (VIII of 2014) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2021 PLP 544 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Sindh (Hyderabad Bench) bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2021 PLP 544 (CLC) (Haji CHRAGUDDIN — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Secretary and 5 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Sindh Environmental Protection Act (VIII of 2014)

Representation

  • Habib-ur-Rehman Jamali, Assistant Advocate General.

Headnotes / Summary

Ss.11(1) & 17(1)

Report of Environmental Protection Agency

Petitioner a Flour Mill owner, running in residential area, claimed that respondents (people from the area) were causing harassment by raising objection on the running of his flour mill therefore, they be restrained from raising objection on the flour mill and police may be directed to provide protection to the petitioner and his property

Respondents produced copies of the report of Environmental Protection Agency which revealed that team of said Agency had visited the flour mill and found that flour dust was blowing there and effluents discharged from it were seen in the left side of the flour mill in a vacant plot; it was pointed out that the petitioner after washing wheat, before crushing, disposed effluents there

Team of Environmental Protection Agency visually saw unhygienic condition due to disposal of dust and solid materials; a restaurant serving meals, tea, etc was also seen there

Agency report further revealed that petitioner had not produced 'No Objection Certificate' from any department except food department nor did he produce environmental approval of the flour mill

Petitioner conceded before the court that he had not obtained environmental approval and permission for running the flour mill and that the flour mill was situated in the residential area

Held; petitioner by filing the constitutional petition had attempted to run his unauthorized flour mill and continue his wrongs, which were detrimental to the health and lives of the residents of the area, where the flour mill was located

Petitioner had also suppressed the real and material facts relating to inspection of Environmental Protection Team and Un-hygienic condition resulting from running of the petitioner's flour mill in the vicinity

Petitioner had not averred said facts in the petition which adversely reflected upon him

Constitutional petition, being meritless and not maintainable, was dismissed, in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

KHADIM HUSSAIN M. SHAIKH, J.

It is, inter alia, contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents Nos.5 and 6 are causing harassment to the petitioner by raising objection on running of the petitioner's Atta Chaki with name and style as Masala Atta Chaki Shadman Town, near Gaya Hospital, Mirpukhas. He, therefore, prays that the private respondents may be restrained from raising objection on the flour mill of the petitioner and direction may be given to the police for providing protection to the petitioner and his property namely subject flour mill.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents Nos.5 and 6 has mainly contended that the petitioner is illegally running a flour mill in residential area without obtaining environmental approval, having worsened the hygienic condition in the area around his unauthorized flour mill and the discharged effluents of the mill, having no proper arrangement for disposal thereof, is being collected in open areas, creating lot of health problems to the residential area including the families of the respondents Nos.5 and 6, whose houses are located in front of the petitioner's flour mill.

3. From a perusal of record it would be seen that the respondents have filed their objections in the shape of counter affidavit denying all the claims and allegations of the petitioner; copies of the report of Environmental Protection Agency Government of Sindh, Regional Office Mirpurkhas bearing No.557 dated 03.11.2016 filed along with objections / counter affidavit of Balach Khan Mari available at page 9-26, reveal that E.P.A Team on visiting the subject flour mill found that flour dust was blowing there and effluents discharged from the subject flour mill were seen in the left side of the flour mill in the vacant plot and it was pointed out that the petitioner after washing wheat, before crushing, disposes effluents there. The Team visually saw hygienic condition there due to disposal of dust and solid materials and a Chapral Hotel serving-meals, tea etc was also seen there and while giving the location of the mill, the petitioner in Paragraph-4 has averred that the subject mill is situated in Shadman Town near Gaya Hospital Mirpurkhas. The report E.P.A further reveals that the petitioner had not produced NOC from any department except food department nor did he produce environmental approval of the subject flour mill. On a query, learned counsel for the petitioner has conceded that the petitioner has not obtained environmental approval and permission for running the subject flour mill and he has further conceded that the said flour mill is located near Gaya Hospital Mirpurkhas in the residential area.

4. In view of the above, I am of the considered view that the petitioner by filing this petition has attempted to run his unauthorized flour mill and to continue his wrongs, which are detrimental to the health and lives of the residents of the area, where the subject flour mill is located. The petitioner has also filed this petition by suppressing the real and material facts relating to the aforesaid inspection of environmental team and un-hygienic condition resulting from running of the petitioner's subject flour mill in the vicinity, as the same are not spelt out from the averments of petition etc. filed by the petitioner, which also adversely reflects upon him. Thus, this petition besides being meritless and not maintainable, is also not bona fide one and same is liable to be dismissed. These are the reasons of short order announced by me on 26-11-2018, whereby this petition was dismissed along-with pending application with no order as to costs. SA/C-4/Sindh Petition dismissed.