2004 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD SALEEM — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2004 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SALEEM — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD SALEEM — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Zafar Iqbal Chohan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss 381-A & 406
Accused had joined investigation and stolen vehicle had already been recovered- --Accused had placed on record copy of application moved by him against complainant prior to the registration of the case
Registration of criminal case against accused, prima facie, was outcome of ulterior motive
Accused had no criminal history
Ad interim pre-arrest bail already granted to accused was confirmed, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Zafar Iqbal Chohan for Petitioner. Shahzad Hassan for the State. Date of hearing: 8th April, 2003. Petitioner Ch. Muhammad Saleem s/o Ch. Siraj Din seeks pre arrest bail in case F.1.R. No.91, dated 5-3-2002 under section 381-A, P.P.C. (later on deleted and section 406, P.P.C. was added) registered with Police Station Batala Colony, Faisalabad,
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith two other persons stole the car belonging to the complainant.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner and State have been heard exhaustively and recd has been perused
4. The petitioner has joined the investigation. The stolen vehicle has already been recovered. Petitioner has placed on record copy of application moved by him against the complainant prior to the registration of the instant case, therefore, prima facie, registration of criminal case against the petitioner is outcome of ulterior motive. The petitioner has no criminal history, therefore, ad interim pre-arrest bail already granted to him on 27-3-2002 is confirmed subject to his furnishing fresh bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. H.B.T./M-434/L Bail granted.