2006 PLP 542 (YLR)
NAZIK HUSSAIN alias GHULAM NAZIK and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 542 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Nazir Ahmad Siddiqui, J |
| Parties | NAZIK HUSSAIN alias GHULAM NAZIK and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 542 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 542 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Nazir Ahmad Siddiqui, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 542 (YLR) (NAZIK HUSSAIN alias GHULAM NAZIK and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Hussain Bhutta for Petitioners.
- Mahmood ul Hassan Qureshi for Respondent:
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337-F(v), 337-L(b) & 34
Delay of three days in lodging F.I.R., was not properly explained
Accused was behind the bars for the last almost four months and there was no likelihood of commencement of Trial in near future
Alleged offences did not fall within prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C.
Case having already been registered under S.324, P.P.C. on the report of brother of accused against son of complainant, possibility could not be ruled out that case against accused could be a counter-blast of same
Accused were admitted to bail, in circumstances. Bilal Ahmad, S.I.
Judgment & Decree
NAZIR AHMAD SIDDIQUI, J.--Petitioners seek post-arrest bail in a case registered vide F.I.R. No.185 of 2005 dated 29-8-2005 under sections 337-F(v), 337-L(b) and 34, P.P.C. at Police Station Muhammadpur District Rajanpur.
2. As per F.I.R. petitioners caused injuries with their sticks on the wrist of right hand and back of left hand and buttocks of left leg of the complainant.
3. Arguments heard. Record perused.
4. There is a delay of three days in lodging the F.I.R., not properly explained; that the petitioner is behind the bars for the last almost four months and there is no likelihood of commencement of the trial in near future; that the alleged offences do not fall within the Prohibitory Clause of section 497, Cr.P.C.; that a criminal case has already been registered vide F.I.R. No.183 dated 26-8-2005 under section 324, P.P.C. on the report of Sadiq Hussain, a brother of the petitioner Nazak Hussain against Akbar, son of the complainant, so, the possibility cannot be ruled out that the present case against the petitioners may be a counter blast of the same.
5. For what has been stated above, this petition is allowed and the petitioners are admitted to bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rs.Fifty thousand) each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./N-118/L Bail granted.