1994 PLP 1755 (SCMR)
MEHR DIL and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FAQIR HUSSAIN and 11 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1994 PLP 1755 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah, CJ and Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J |
| Parties | MEHR DIL and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FAQIR HUSSAIN and 11 others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1755 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1755 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah, CJ and Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1755 (SCMR) (MEHR DIL and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FAQIR HUSSAIN and 11 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Haji Bashir Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 6th December, 1992.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and Decree dated 31‑3‑1992 of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar in Civil Revision No. 89 of 1985). ‑‑‑‑S. 12‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Plaintiff's suit for declaration that he was owner of land in question, was dismissed by all the three Courts below‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Plaintiff had not been able to point out any misreading or non‑reading of evidence or any error of law in the concurrent judgments of Courts below‑‑‑No interference was called for‑‑‑Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD RAFIQ TARAR, J.‑‑‑The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment of the Peshawar High Court dated 31‑3‑1992 passed in Civil Revision No. 89 of 1985.
2. Relevant facts are that the petitioners filed a suit for a declaration that they were owners of land in dispute measuring 8 Kanals 11 Marlas in Khasra No.
718. After trial the suit was dismissed by the learned Additional Civil Judge Swabi vide judgment dated 18‑10‑1983 and their appeal against the said judgment was also dismissed by the Additional District Judge, Swabi on 13‑1‑1985. They filed a Civil Revision in the Peshawar High Court which was dismissed on 31‑3‑1992 as already mentioned.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contested the findings of facts by the three Courts below. He has, however, not been able to point out any mis reading or non‑reading of evidence or any error of law. In the circumstances no interference is called for. The Petition is dismissed. AA/M‑1922/S Leave refused.