1968 SCMR 45 (PLP)
GHULAM MUHAMMAD-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM AND OTHERS-Respondents
| Citation | 1968 SCMR 45 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | S. A. Rahman and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ |
| Parties | GHULAM MUHAMMAD-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM AND OTHERS-Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 SCMR 45 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 SCMR 45 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: S. A. Rahman and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 SCMR 45 (PLP) (GHULAM MUHAMMAD-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM AND OTHERS-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- M. Nazar Khan, Senior Attorney Supreme Court for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(In the matter of withdrawal of petition). Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 58(3)-Petition for special leave to appeal-Withdrawal-Respondent not entering appearance despite notice of withdrawal petition-Leave rescinded and petition dismissed as withdrawn-Supreme Court Rules, 1956, O. X111, R.II. P L D 1966 SC 1
Judgment & Decree
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, J.-Leave was granted in this case on the 10th October 1966, to consider whether the High Court had, upon principles consistent with the decision of this Court in the case of Mian Jamal Shah (P L D 1966 SC 1), interfered with an order of an Election Tribunal. Since then, however, no further step has been taken. The respondents have also not entered appearance but the appellant now wishes to withdraw the petition for leave to appeal. On the 27th of November 1967, notices were directed by this Court to issue to the respondents of the present application for the withdrawal of the petition. Notices have now issued but the respondents have even now not entered appearance. In the A circumstances, at the request of the petitioner the leave granted is rescinded and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There will be no order as to costs, as none of the respondents have entered appearance.